By President Stephen M. Veazey – October 1, 2008
The gavel Joseph Smith III used to preside over conferences of the Reorganization sits atop a
credenza in my office at the Temple. I do not own it; it belongs to the church.
Occasionally, while mulling over thorny church issues, I walk over and pick up the gavel, respectfully
examining its slightly cracked ivory head and beautifully carved wood handle. Cradling it in my hands,
I feel that I have some tangible connection to the past. Thus engaged, my mind wanders back through
time to ponder the personalities, events, and circumstances that shaped today’s church. Although I
have read many church history books, I always want to know more about my religious ancestors and
the historical contexts in which they expressed their faith.
While I was much more than casually aware of church history previously, since becoming president of
the church I have engaged in an extensive study of our story. I have explored books and articles from
a wide spectrum of scholars, authors, and publishers, ranging from the faithful to the skeptical and in
between. Truth has nothing to fear from scrutiny.
During recent decades there has been a mounting wave of added information as religious historians
have gained access to more source material and have written with increasing frankness about various
topics. Also, in the past few years, the media spotlight—including several high-profile television
series—has been turned on to Latter Day Saint history because of the Mitt Romney campaign for the
U.S. Presidency and the disturbing activities of LDS fundamentalist groups.
Because of my exploration of various credible works, and probing discussions with historians, some of
my previously held notions have been challenged and adjusted in the face of additional knowledge.
The “apologetic” approach to church history—presenting our story in as favorable a light as possible—
is not sufficient for the journey ahead. That approach does not evidence the integrity that must be
fundamental to our witness and ministry.
While I have adjusted some personal perspectives, I have mainly found a deeper understanding of the
many complex, interrelated factors that shaped the church over the years. I have come to see more
clearly how God’s Spirit worked in the lives of imperfect, but highly dedicated people to shape a faith
movement that continues to play a vital role in God’s unfolding purposes today. As a result, I have
gained even greater confidence that the same Spirit that saw the church through seemingly
insurmountable challenges in the past will continue to sustain and guide us in the future.
As the First Presidency has joined with others in exploring issues emerging from the ongoing study of
Restoration history, we decided it would be timely to provide a set of “Church History Principles” to
help guide the church’s reflections and discussions. These principles have been distilled from the
insights of past and present World Church leaders, church historians, theologians, and others. We
hope the statements will prove useful as the church continues to explore the personalities, events, and
meanings of our church’s colorful, inspiring story.
Church History Principles
1. Continuing exploration of our history is part of identity formation. As a church we seek
always to clarify our identity, message, and mission. In our faith story, we see clearly God’s Spirit
giving this faith community tools, insights, and experiences for divine purposes. A people with a
shared memory of their past, and an informed understanding of its meaning, are better prepared to
chart their way into the future.
2. History informs but does not dictate our faith and beliefs. The foundation and continuing
source for our faith is God’s revelation in Jesus Christ. Studying history is not about proving or
disproving mystical, spiritual, or revelatory experiences that birth or transform religious movements.
Sound history informs faith, and healthy faith leads to insights about history. Theology and faith,
guided by the Holy Spirit, must play an important role in discovering the enduring meaning of such
events as well as the deeper truths found in them. Our understanding of our history affects our faith
and beliefs. However, our past does not limit our faith and beliefs to what they were historically.
3. The church encourages honest, responsible historical scholarship. Studying history involves
related fields. Historians use academic research to get as many facts as they can; then, they interpret
those facts to construct as clear a picture as possible of what was going on in the past. This includes
analyzing human culture to see how it affected events. Historians try to understand patterns of
meaning to interpret what the past means for our future. This process should avoid “presentism,” or
interpreting the past based on a current worldview and culture instead of the culture of the time.
4. The study of church history is a continuing journey. If we say that a book on history is the
only true telling of the story, we risk “canonizing” one version, a tendency we have shown in the past.
This blocks further insights from continuing research. Good historical inquiry understands that
conclusions are open to correction as new understanding and information comes from ongoing study.
5. Seeing both the faithfulness and human flaws in our history makes it more believable
and realistic, not less. Our history has stories of great faith and courage that inspire us. Our history
also includes human leaders who said and did things that can be shocking to us from our current
perspective and culture. Historians try not to judge—instead, they try to understand by learning as
much as possible about the context and the meaning of those words and actions at the time. The
result is empathy instead of judgment. Our scriptures are consistent in pointing out that God, through
grace, uses imperfect people for needed ministry and leadership.
6. The responsible study of church history involves learning, repentance, and
transformation. A church with a mission focused on promoting communities of reconciliation, justice,
and peace should be self-critical and honest about its history. It is important for us to confess when
we have been less than what the gospel of Jesus Christ calls us to be. This honesty prompts us to
repent, and it strengthens our integrity. Admitting past mistakes helps us avoid repeating them and
frees us from the influences of past injustices and violence in our history. We must be humble and
willing to repent, individually and as a community, to contribute as fully as possible to restoring God’s
shalom on earth.
7. The church has a long-standing tradition that it does not legislate or mandate positions
on matters of church history. Historians should be free to draw their own conclusions after
thorough consideration of evidence. Through careful study and the Holy Spirit’s guidance, the church
is learning how to accept and responsibly interpret all of its history. This includes putting new
information and changing understandings into proper perspective, while emphasizing the parts of our
history that continue to play a role in guiding the church’s identity and mission today.
8. We need to create a respectful culture of dialogue about matters of history. We should not
limit our faith story to one perspective. Diverse viewpoints bring richness to our understanding of
God’s movement in our sacred story. Of course, historians will come to different conclusions as they
study. Therefore, it is important for us to create and maintain a respectful culture that allows different
points of view on history. Our conversation about history should be polite and focused on trying to
understand others’ views. Most important, we should remain focused on what matters most for the
message and mission of the church in this time.
9. Our faith is grounded in God’s revelation in Jesus Christ and the continuing guidance of
the Holy Spirit. We must keep our hearts and minds centered on God’s revelation in Jesus Christ. As
God’s Word alive in human history, Jesus Christ was and is the foundation of our faith and the focus of
the church’s mission and message.